ELECRAFT KPA3 Specifiche Pagina 5

  • Scaricare
  • Aggiungi ai miei manuali
  • Stampa
  • Pagina
    / 9
  • Indice
  • SEGNALIBRI
  • Valutato. / 5. Basato su recensioni clienti
Vedere la pagina 4
From January 2009 QST © ARRL
is actually usable on CW. Alternately, you
can set operating bandwidth by setting the
high and low cut frequencies.
The receiver and transmitter performance
are top notch, as shown in Table 1 and Figures 1
through 3. There is no transceiver in the ama-
teur marketplace that has the close-in dynamic
range performance of the K3 with narrow
roofing filters installed, and most aren’t close
to the K3 in stock form. This is a result of the
HF first IF architecture of the radio, currently
shared only with the Ten-Tec Orion. This
allows the use of narrow roofing filters with
excellent shape factor, compared to radios with
the more common VHF first IF. See my sidebar
in a recent Product Review for a discussion of
the different transceiver architectures and their
impact on dynamic range.
3
Automatic gain control (AGC) threshold
(the signal level at which the AGC starts to
reduce gain), AGC slope and AGC hold time
are menu adjustable. I like to have the audio
level increase a bit with louder signals, but not
as much as the default provided an easy
menu setting fixed that. Similarly, the optimum
AGC threshold depends on the ambient band
noise level, so having it adjustable is a big
plus. I set this menu item to come up with a
front panel button so I could adjust it easily
as I changed bands. Two front panel knobs
can be used for instant adjustment of menu
functions. Both a traditional noise blanker and
a DSP based one are independently available
and are effective.
Dual audio streams are provided to either
stereo headphones or stereo speaker connec-
tions. If you have the second receiver turned
on, one of the channels is connected to each
receiver. I find this the best way to operate
split frequency for working DX stations. It
currently is restricted to being on the same
band as the main receiver, but the ability
to monitor a different band is high on the
firmware to do list. A number of antenna con-
nection options allow different antennas and
front-end filters to be applied to each receiver,
if that makes sense for what you’re doing.
If you don’t have the second receiver, or it
is turned off, the two channels are still useful.
Tapping the audio effects (AFX) button brings
up a simulated stereo stream that can be a
constant phase shift between the audio chan-
nels or any of four delay intervals between the
two channels. It does add a feeling of depth
to the received audio.
The VFO tuning rate offers considerable
flexibility. The front panel RATE button
toggles the regular tuning steps between 10
and 50 Hz (20 Hz by menu selection). An-
other front panel button moves from regular
to either FINE (1 Hz per step) or COARSE.
Menu settings for COARSE steps vary per-
3
J. Hallas, W1ZR, “The Ten-Tec Omni-VII HF/
6 Meter Transceiver,Product Review, QST,
Jul 2007, p 63.
There has been considerable discussion on e-mail groups about which of the
roofing filters to use to fill the five available slots in the K3. These roofing filters
are key to the radio’s superb dynamic performance, and you get to choose which
ones you want. The available filters are either five-pole (at $100 each), made by
Elecraft, or eight-pole (at $126), made for Elecraft by International Radio (Inrad).
The bandwidths available are:
Five-pole: 200, 500, 2700 Hz.
Eight-pole: 250, 400, 1800, 2100, 2800, 6000 and 13,000 Hz.
A 2700 Hz roofing filter is standard in both the main and subreceiver. At the
time of order the 2800 Hz filter may be substituted for $96 additional.
There are some limits to choice, however. In the main receiver, either a 2700
or 2800 Hz filter is required for CW and normal SSB transmission, the 13 kHz
FM filter is required for FM operation and the 6 kHz AM filter is required for AM or
extended (to 4 kHz) SSB transmission. The transmit filters must be in the main re-
ceiver chain. The subreceiver does not get involved in transmission, so the restric-
tions don’t apply. We selected a representative sample of filters to determine the
benefits of the narrower filters, a common question on e-mail groups.
The ARRL Lab test results are shown in Table 2. Note that we have included
some data that we don’t usually report on, because we found the results of inter-
est. First we measured the blocking and third-order dynamic range at a 1 kHz
spacing, because we felt the benefit of the narrowest filters would show up more
clearly there. Second, we generally measure from each side of center and show
the worst case reading. Here we have provided both because some of the filters
do not have a symmetrical response.
The results are interesting, and somewhat surprising — particularly the IMD
data. The blocking dynamic range, now termed blocking gain compression, acts
the way I would expect. As the filters get narrower, the close spacing dynamic
range improves rather dramatically. The 2 kHz separation data may be of most
interest to SSB contesters, while the 1 kHz data probably applies most to CW
operators. The IMD data, on the other hand does not quite act as expected —
particularly with respect to the change from 2700 to 1800 Hz filters. The dynamic
range at all spacings is actually somewhat worse with the 1800 Hz filter. It appears,
confirmed with discussions with Elecraft, that the IMD products are actually occur-
ring in the filter itself. This was observed in two samples of this filter and Elecraft
reported that they are working on developing an improved selection process.
So which should you get? For SSB, the gain compression may be most impor-
tant, so I’m glad I have the 1800 Hz in my radio. It’s worth noting that often adja-
cent channel SSB transmit IMD products will be signigicantly higher than
those generated in the receiver. I am also pleased with the 400 Hz filter in my
main receiver for tight CW conditions. Two facts are clear — even with the stan-
dard filter, this radio is a fine performer, and — better dynamic performance is
possible with sharper filters, but IMD improvement may not be as dramatic as
expected.Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR
A Close Look at K3 Roofing Filters
Table 2
K3 Dynamic Performance with Different Roofing Filters
Blocking Gain Compression, (dB) at MDS (preamp off, 14 MHz)
Spacing (kHz) Roofing Filter (Hz)
above/below 2800 2700 1800 500 400
20 144/144 145/145 146/146 136/135 142/142
5 143/143 143/143 145/145 134/134 140/140
2 134/86 115/85 143/144 133/134 140/140
1 113/84 93/83 127/90 110/110 131/131
Third Order Intermodulation Dynamic Range (dB) at MDS (preamp off, 14 MHz)
Spacing (kHz) Roofing Filter (Hz)
above/below 2800 2700 1800 500 400
20 104/104 105/106 101/98 104/104 105/106
5 105/103 96/106 90/84 102/101 106/105
2 99/100 90/89 74/82 90/90 106/103
1 94/81 89/79 72/81 87/82 99/99
Vedere la pagina 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Commenti su questo manuale

Nessun commento